Engels um Íslendinga og Norðurlönd
Þar kom að því. Fann loksins skrif Friðriks Engels um Íslendinga, en ég hafði leitað að þeim á hinum undarlegustu vefsíðum eins og marxists.org og ámóta.
Þetta er nú ekki merkilegt. Í einhverju fúlsku-kasti fer Engels að argast útí hinar ómerkilegu þjóðir í Norðri í bréfi til félaga síns Marx. Honum finnst allir ljótir og leiðinlegir, og alveg sérlega svo um landann:
"I have several times felt tempted to be proud of the fact that I am at least no Dane, nor yet an Icelander, but merely a German."
Þjóðremba, þjóðernishyggja eða rasismi? Hvað um það, hér er bréfið fyrir áhugasama.
Brotni glugginn heimsóttur aftur
Fyrir nokkru þýddi ég hluta af Hvað menn sjá og sjá ekki eftir Bastiat. Fyrsti kaflinn er um hinn mikla efnahagsávinning sem verður af því að krakki brýtur rúðu. Auðvitað er það fásinna að það sé almennt gott að gluggar brotni, enda sýnir Bastiat fram á það með skemmtilegum hætti.
Því miður metur nútíma hagfræði raunvörulegan efnahagsávinning (eða tap) einstaklinga ekki vel. GDP eða Gross Domestic Product en það er mælikvarði á allar vörur og þjónustu sem koma á markaðinn á hverju ári. Því miður er samsetningin ekki sérlega nákvæm, enda erfitt verk að taka það saman svo vel sé.
As recently as 50 years ago, economists regarded the vitality of the economy as consonant with its ability to produce things people want (and would pay for). Today, the economy has been redefined into something called the Gross Domestic Product, or GDP. It measures all goods and services brought to market in a given year. But is it really an accurate measure of how well an economy is serving people's needs? Here are some outlandish ways the GDP can be boosted.
Break something around the house, like a television, a dish, or a window. Replacing these increases the GDP and creates jobs.
Smash up the car. It will have to be fixed or replaced. The auto industry employs, directly and indirectly, one of every seven workers in the U.S., and they need the overtime.
For great results, burn down the house. Don't worry. If you handle it right, insurance will pay for it and the rebuilding will keep a lot of people busy for a while.
Hún er undarleg þessi hagfræði. Síðan koma miklir spekingar frá bönkunum og segja okkur að "hagvöxturinn" sé ekki "raunvörulegur". Klapp klapp fyrir þeim.
Allt að fara til helvítis, enn eina ferðina
Frændi okkar frá Danmörku, Björn Lomborg, fór á myndina the day after tomorrow og var ekki hrifinn (nema af brellunum). Það sem honum fannst mest athugavert á ekki að koma á óvart: myndin ýkir upp hættuna á global warming dæminu all svakalega og aðstandendur myndarinnar vilja nota hana sem áráðurstæki fyrir lagasetningum sem eiga að draga úr gróðurhúsaráhrifunum.
Hvað er að því, munu margir spyrja. Er ekki gott að vernda umhverfið og þurfum við aumur almúginn smá hjálp við það. Gefum frænda vorum orðið:
If politicians were to snap to attention, what would be achieved? Implementing the Kyoto agreement on climate change would cost at least $150 billion each year, yet would merely postpone global warming for six years by 2100. The family in Bangladesh who will get flooded will have an extra six years to move.
Even if the movie's creators are right – and the scientists are wrong – and the Gulf Stream does collapse within a decade, then Kyoto would have made no difference.
For the cost of implementing Kyoto in just one year, we could permanently provide clean drinking water and sanitation to everyone on the planet. Yet it is unlikely that Emmerich will cast Brad Pitt creating sewerage systems in Kenya for his next glamorous movie. Nor is he likely to tell us the tale of governments investing in malarial vaccines or global conferences removing trade barriers. Bjorn Lomborg: Entertaining discredited ideas of a climatic catastrophe. The Australian
Sem sagt, að því gefnu að kenningasmiðir hafi rétt fyrir sér, að því gefnu að á næstu 100 árum verði ekki nein meiriháttar eldgos (sem valda global cooling) og að því gefnu að stjórnvaldsaðgerðirnar nái markmiðum sínum, þá munu þessar aðgerðir fresta hækkun hitastigs um 6 ár á hverjum 100 árum.
Allt þetta fyrir árlegan kostnað sem er sambærilegur þjóðarframleiðslu lítils lands í norður evrópu sem Lomborg ætti að þekkja til.
Það er svo auðvelt að berjast fyrir einhverju sem einhver sér, og ef það er ekki nógu ljóst er gerð 100 miljóna bíómynd til að styðja sitt mál. Það sem menn ekki sjá eru fyrirtækin sem fara á hausinn í framtíðnni vegna þessara gjalda. Menn sjá ekki minkandi markaði sem þróunarlönd þurfa til að bjarga sér úr fátækt. Menn sjá ekki börn deyja úr malaríu eða öðrum fyrirbyggjanlegum sjúkdómum vegna ofuráhuga vesturlanda á ólæknanlegu og ósannanlegu vandamáli þar sem menn beita meðölum sem hafa aldalanga sögu um að hafa ekki náð markmiðum sínum.
The Psychopathic Dictator
Psychopathology has always played an important role in History. It is estimated that 2-5% of all individuals are psychopaths, and it is quite clear that the number is higher among politicians. Why the worst get on top is an interesting question per se and is a worthy subject by itself.
But who do we diagnose someone as a psychopath. There is no universal rule to do this, but since psychopaths are amoral and only care for themselves (although they most often maintain the opposite) and one should try to find signs and symptoms of just that in their life.
DSM-IV: Antisocial Personality Disorder Definition
Sociopathic Personality or Antisocial Personality Disorder is a personality disorder whose essential feature is a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood. The individual must be at least age 18 and must have a history of some symptoms of conduct disorder before age 15. It is diagnosed by the presence of three (or more) of the following:
The occurrence of antisocial behavior is not exclusively during the course of schizophrenia or a manic episode. Some of the associated features are: depressed mood, drug addiction and erratic behavior.
- failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviours as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
- deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
- impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
- irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
- reckless disregard for safety of self or others
- consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations
- lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another
ICD-10: F60.2 Dissocial (Antisocial) Personality Disorder
Personality disorder, usually coming to attention because of a gross disparity between behavior and the prevailing social norms, and characterized by at least 3 of the following:
(a) callous unconcern for the feelings of others;
(b) gross and persistent attitude of irresponsibility and disregard for social norms, rules and obligations;
(c) incapacity to maintain enduring relationships, though having no difficulty in establishing them;
(d) very low tolerance to frustration and a low threshold for discharge of aggression, including violence;
(e) incapacity to experience guilt and to profit from experience, particularly punishment;
(f) marked proneness to blame others, or to offer plausible rationalizations, for the behavior that has brought the patient into conflict with society.
There may also be persistent irritability as an associated feature. Conduct disorder during childhood and adolescence, though not invariably present, may further support the diagnosis.
* amoral, antisocial, asocial, psychopathic, and sociopathic personality (disorder)
* conduct disorders
* emotionally unstable personality disorder
These are the diagnostic criteria that are most commonly used for a medical diagnosis of psychopaths. The criteria above are not irrefutable science, but with relevant experience they can be used for fairly accurate diagnosis.
The psychopath comes in every shape and form. No specific class or background does seem to generate more psychopaths than others. The psychopaths can be as good looking and clever as the next person and does only occasionally stand out in a crowd.
If one compares the diagnostic criteria seen above with the average dictator, chances are that most or all of the criteria apply. This is of course pretty easy to do, once they start to purge the nation of the Jews, counterrevolutionaries or whatever the propaganda machine deems to be the most likely for popularity to persecute. However, for those that the years before they came to power are well documented, it is usually quite easy to make the diagnosis.
Take the early years of one Adolf Hitler for example. In his childhood Hitler did show his famous temper tantrums, uncontrollable outburst of rage, when confronted or criticized. This is quite typical of psychopaths who almost invariably can't stand the slightest criticism. His personal life was also quite pathological. He had trouble bonding with people in a normal way and had few true friends growing up. His 'love' his niece Geli Raubal was more like an obsession that the poor girl got out of by committing suicide. Eva Braun also attempted suicide but survived, only commit suicide by her masters side a decade later. Hitler of course never blamed himself for his misfortunes as an young man, but he often barely survived in Vienna as an struggling artist. The same trait is evident and well documented, when things started to wrong in the war, he blamed everyone but himself.
The megalomania was also all-consuming. In the dying days of the war when he was in the famous Berlin bunker (with a horde of people, all but one were quite pathological characters) he said that if he should perish, the German people should as well. The United States Office of Strategic Services (OSS) made a psychological profile of Hitler and there are many quotes that are quite revealing of his character: "Do you realize that you are in the presence of the greatest German of all time?; I cannot be mistaken. What I do and say is historical; For the last twenty-four hours I was the supreme court of the German people; I am one of the hardest men Germany has had for decades, perhaps for centuries, equipped with the greatest authority of any German leader... but above all, I believe in my success. I believe in it unconditionally." The verdict of the OSS is of no surprise.
His ideology was, besides being evil, a mixed bag of socialistic ideas blended with fierce nationalism and xenophobia. These ideas were neither original nor coherent. The discrepancies are obvious to all to see and this is what most people have speculated over one time or another. Why was this non-Aryan looking man creating a master race of blond, strong and beautiful people? What is the difference between the Poles, Dutch and Russians and Germans, with respect to blondishness. There is no difference between these nations in that particular mater. What about the nationalism and the internationalism of the Aryan people, but Hitler said that the Nordic people, plus few other nations, were a little Aryan as well. What about his personal life and his hatred of the Jews. One would think that his family had been killed by some crazy Jews. This aspect of Hitler’s life has been studied well by bewildered historians and no reasonable explanation was discovered.
The discrepancies between Hitler’s life and his ideology are easily explainable by his personality; He just does not care.
Many other examples can be found throughout history. Fidel Castro is a fine example of a psychopathic individual that has been able to mesmerize a great deal (the left) of the human population. The son of a rich plantation owner, Castro did show at an early age many of the character traits that would eventually make him famous. His brother Raul said of him: "But Fidel was different. He dominated situations... And, every day, he would fight. He had a very explosive character. He challenged the biggest and the strongest ones, and when he was beaten, he started it all over again the next day. He never quit."* The shallow Fidel took identity refuge in the legendary revolutionary Jose Marti, again and again he discovered eerie similarities to his life and the one of Marti and talked endlessly of this in his numerous speeches. This is just what psychopaths do. They no only steal physical things and lie to advance their cause. They also heavily 'borrow' the identity of people, nations or national heritage. This is what Adolph Hitler did with the Nordic heritage and Wagner. He managed to damage Wagner’s image to the degree that only recently one of his Opera was first played in Israel.
Castro was not merely an unruly teenager in his university years. He was actually quite active in one of the university gangs that was in constant war with other 'youth movements', and Castro was implicated in several murders. This is Fidel Castro in his teens and early twenties. He was not convicted, but then again, are gang members ever convicted of anything.
After rising to power after the revolution, the friendly cigar-smoking revolutionary, started to kill anyone of those in his government that opposed him or was the slightest threat to his power. The all to familiar, after-the-revolution purges. He persecuted the imperialists (foreign companies) and land owners in from the onset of the revolution. But he did not stop there. Throughout his reign, he has persecuted small business owners and private farms, that by no means fit either category. He deviated from his particular form of socialism to pronounce himself a Marx-Leninist, when it became convenient to suck up to the Soviets. Hardly a strong sense of ideology.
We also can see the footprints of the megalomaniac in the Economic policies of Cuba. First, he decided that Cuba was too dependent on sugar production and started to divert the economy toward 'industrialization'. When that failed in a most disastrous way, he became obsessed with sugar, so much that in 1969-70 he forced the bulk of the nation to produce sugar, only to gain some goal that he had set by himself. He even changed the calendar and abolished Christmas, so feverish he was in reaching the goal. Of course the goal was not reached and in the following year a new law was introduced, 'slackers' were to punished severely.
These two are only random examples of psychopathic dictators. The point being, if one takes a good look at the lives and actions of these dictators and their henchmen it becomes obvious that most, if not all, are easily diagnosed as psychopaths. This applies to the megalomaniac Napoleon, cruel Saddam Hussein and the inhumane Chairman Mao and many many more.
*Volker Sierka, Fidel Castro. A biography. p.14)